Entry: Is chivalry dead? Thursday, January 18, 2007



Since that horrible breakup, I vowed to stop being so naive. I decided to stop believing in love. It would always fuel such interesting arguments, especially among the girlfriends.

But I guess somewhere along the way (somewhere during the time I decided to start dating again), I changed my mind and concluded that it was okay to acknowledge the presence of a significant other. A woman just needed to hold her ground, draw the lines and define herself within the relationship. In other words, we had to wear the pants.

Still, it wasn't til recently when it dawned me. The reason why women had to start taking charge was because of the pure lack of gentlemenliness from the male species. These days, the men who do possess some form of gallantry are mostly the brownnosed sweet talkers who just want to get into your pants. Really. The rest of the male species just don't have a clue.

How do I know this?

Scenario #1

It's raining. The bus stop is filled with people and the bus is late. A pregnant lady totters up to the stand with an umbrella. Most people don't even notice, restless because they're late for some engagement or other. Some look on sympathetically. Finally, a girl stands up and offers her a chair. The seated boys continue complaining that the bus is late, as usual.

Scenario #2

The bus arrives. Everyone rushes to the entrance of the vehicle even before it had stopped moving cos no one wants to end up having to stand. Some people hang back so they don't have to line up in the pouring rain. The last people who end up getting on the bus are the ladies. The boys are comfortable in their seats relieved they didn't have to be the like the woman carrying that heavy-looking bag who came on late and got stuck standing.

Scenario #3

Few passangers get off the bus at the first stop while others wait to get on. A young couple runs across the road not wanting to miss it. Hand in hand, the guy runs ahead without looking back to see if the girlfriend was doing okay running in her baju kurung. Getting to the other side, he would walk on the inside of the road, allowing his girl to get splashed by the passing cars.

Ladies and Gents, all this in the span of 15 minutes.

And they wonder why we insist that we don't really need them anymore.  

Agreed, chivalry IS an old-fashioned idea. Being an independant 20-year-old woman, some people accuse me of being a feminist. Yet, even though I project the image of being assertive, I still very much like it when my male friends wait for me in the car until I'm safely inside when they drop me off, just to ensure that I'm safe. And on the other hand, I never let my male friends walk home alone if I have a car and can pick them up. It has nothing to do with sexes, it's all part of being respectful to each other in friendships and relationships.

Still, I enjoy being treated like a lady and women should not try to be like men because the only similarities we share is that we are human beings. More importantly, men have to realize that there's a thin line between chivalry and sexism and men must now proactively gauge the requirements of a women.

Another interesting idea is how the death of male chivalry further boosted women's lib - an ideal many men have opposed over the years. Those days, women had always been portrayed as the lesser species, the weaker species; those days, male valor existed. As it died out, so did male dominance. Little did they realize that those little things were what formed the social context of courtship. It was those little things that defined the fine lines that differentiated gender conduct and the way males and females behaved.

By losing the small things, we go on to lose much bigger things. The protection of women that used to be instinctive.

Chivalry IS dead. Ladies, looks like we'll just have to get used to it.

   6 comments

Shaque
September 10, 2008   06:43 PM PDT
 
wow. the age old debate. men n women. nobody wins, but somehow, we're the only ones losing.

Comedian Dave Chappelle once said "yes. ladies, chivalry IS dead... (applause)... and women killed it"

i cant help it. its funny.

tapi tu ah dier.. its always that same spot for us you know, *damned if i do, damned if i dont.* Ben is a perfect example.. and what did he ended up doing? he has to understand the woman's situation before his. and he doesnt even get a cookie for it. we run into this everyday.

theres so much to say, but what i want is.. just chill ah. men, women. who cares. why cant we see everyone as an individual, instead of putting everybody in the same boat. theres 5 billion people. divide it into 2 groups. dont you think the relative difference would be excruciatingly high? isnt there a million things that affect and shape who we are today, rite now? i thought, more than men, women are the ones always shouting that all of us are unique? yet we measure ourselves so vaguely.. cmon. relax. i know where my position as a man in the world. u know yours too. so lets just get on with our lives eyh. :D











Crux
November 24, 2007   11:40 PM PST
 
Chivalry was a concept advanced during a time when women were still inferior, as a way of 'being nice'. It was because women were the "lesser species" that many men felt, inside, that some form of courtesy had to be extended to them (eg because she's physically weaker, it's a good gesture to give up your seat for her) as a sign of showing that they weren't completely disrespected.

Now, however, with the advance of feminism, there's simply no reason for chivalry to exist anymore. Women are legally just as capable as men, and there are many more women entering professional fields compared to men in these present times. Courtesy still exists, of course, but to a much lesser level than chivalry prescribed.

Especially since, as Ben below mentioned, overextending hospitality can be viewed as condescending, in the era where most women want to be viewed as in charge of their own lives, without needing any man to help her out.

Just as if an unemployed man were to get employed, he cannot continue to expect unemployment allowance (if applicable) as a token to reduce his burden, right? It's not a very accurate example, but the underlying concept is quite similar.

You either choose between equality in all aspects, or inequality with handouts. You cannot expect to have both.
ben
November 8, 2007   12:54 PM PST
 
seriously, its not our faults. surely there are some bums who don't give a damn. but there have been numerous times when I've been shot down for trying to help.

For instance, I once held the door open for a lady who was carrying a bag that looked heavy. She was like I can handle it myself and said something rued about me being chauvinistic. I was like WTF bitch? you think I'm tryin to pick your ugly ass up? Was pissed for about 3 secs. then assumed that she was going thru a bad day.

I can't blame guys for changing their ways after a feminazi experience like mine.

However, most times when I give up my seat, etc things don't turn out that bad. lol

You're probably right about the dwindling population of chivalrous men

Just when those Boags St Johns ads got me convinced that gallantry was back.
wani
February 5, 2007   03:57 PM PST
 
true. malaysian men yang benar-benar berkualiti sudah pupus. the good ones are mostly taken while others are somewhere in jail or pusat pemulihan or jadi mat rempit. blah.
Pudtz
January 20, 2007   10:10 AM PST
 
Guys, there's nothing wrong with holding the door open for a lady, or pulling her chair out for her in a restaurant! Not all of us are going to snap your heads off for it!

Just because you offer to help us carry the 50 shopping bags we're holding onto doesn't mean we think you think we're weak. In fact, it's all very nice of you. And we can still go dutch over the meal when we go on a date. I'll drive.
Miss Aida
January 19, 2007   02:05 PM PST
 
Yes, I think chivalry is dead. At least among Malaysian men. An education is needed. Bah.

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments